The courts and the egg I know the usual expression is"
the venue or the egg . " Come on, that is often asked as a waiver of some material to keep a right, privilege or honor itself. Or, more commonly, the waiver of a right in exchange for compensation.
Well not. this case we must fight for the egg, but also by the courts.
Although the egg also has plenty of forum (and I leave the puns, really): "Law Sinde "rondón casting a Final Disposition of Bill
Sustainable Economy seems to me quite impresentable
from a legal point of view and under the rule of law. Join originally planned legal consequences only for serious crimes to a procedure with fewer guarantees that the handling of a traffic ticket (which is saying) is something very satisfying for that industry "content" that has not yet realized that we are in the XXI century, but any citizen you should make your hair stand on end, so involved and, above all, the precedent that implies.
But the venue, alas, The forum is the straw that breaks the camel. As
account Antonio Delgado, "Law Sinde" is not just a nonsense in itself, but also the process that led to its creation and, barring some miracle, its imminent approval.
a process which is summarized in a long series of pressures our leaders ("theoretical
rulers?) By the U.S. followed by the corresponding lameness of these.
As well remembers
Javi Peláez, national sovereignty resides in the English people. So says the Constitution
and it should happen in any country. But cases as "Sindegate" or the even more bloody of U.S. pressure (and assignments of our government) to
avoid prosecution for the death of Jose Couso show that our social and democratic state law also has more than one facet of banana republic. Only without the republic, of course.
I do not know if we can fix that or how. But at least showing that some, many, we are not at all agree with this policy of "send you" and "Yes, bwana."
